显示标签为“Airport”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Airport”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年4月24日星期日

U.S. airport opens after tornado

24 April 2011 last updated 04:06 am tornado damage to Missouri airport U.S. from Lambert-St Louis Airport is reopening, after a tornado by its copied main terminal.

The storm in the State of Missouri rip off a large portion of the terminal roof, shattering Windows and sending debris flying.

Several people were treated for minor injuries.

Later reopened for a handful of incoming flights and officials expect airport that most flights to start as planned by early Sunday.

However, the damaged concourse for up to two months closed remain.

"We are not the most beautiful airport morning have, but we have an operational airport," airport Director Rhonda Hamm Niebruegge said.

Pass through the storm, a number of Central and Eastern Europe (Missouri), also flattened houses in the area like trees and tore down power lines.

Lambert-St Louis Airport statement a say all flights have been cancelled pending safety assessments of full and clean-up was under way.

'Grown men cry'

St. Louis County Police Chief Tim Fitch, who was at the airport the storm approached, said to people-watching, that the tornado had to suddenly encrypt for security.

map

"Over time we came into the building blew doors," he said.

"Literally 10 seconds later, it was about." It is amazing, to me, more people were not injured. "

Dianna Merrill, who was waiting for a flight to New York, said that they had sought out the window in the hope that their flight is delayed would arrive.

"Glass was blowing everywhere." The ceiling was covered... the wind blew debris all over the place, "said she."

"It was like to be in a horror film." Grown men wept. "It was awful."


View the original article here

2011年4月22日星期五

Airport ', 10,000 jobs to create'

20 April 2011, last updated at 23: 37 GMT Coventry Airport in 2009 airport was used by private jets, was in the West Midlands in the framework of the rehabilitation of Coventry Airport before it was closed in 2009 more than 10,000 jobs are created, the new owner says.

Sir Peter Rigby has announced £ 250 m in the airport in Baginton help, develop a business park on the website invest.

Financial problems previous owner West Midlands Airport forced to close in December 2009.

It had operated as a cargo terminal and a basis for private jets.

Passenger airline Thomsonfly stopped the outbound flights were rejected by the airport in November 2008 after plans for a new terminal after a public inquiry.

The investigation found one extra terminal would cause too much noise.


View the original article here

2011年3月31日星期四

Airport Body Scanners Not a Health Risk

 A new study reports that airport body scanners do not pose a health risk. The scans deliver an amount of radiation equivalent to 3 to 9 minutes of the radiation received on a normal day.

Full-body scanners used to secure airports, about 1,000 of which will be deployed across the United States by year's end, do not pose health risks, a study released has found.


The University of California study appearing in the "Archives of Internal Medicine" found that a traveler would have to go through a body scanner 50 times to receive the same amount of radiation as from a dental X ray.


The researchers also said a lung X ray was equivalent to 1,000 trips through an airport scanner, while a mammogram delivers as much radiation as passing through such a scanner 4,000 times.


The study focused on X-ray machines dubbed "backscatter" which use low-dose X rays, similar to those used in medical imaging. So far there are some 486 full-body scanners in place in 78 U.S. airports.


"The radiation doses emitted by the scans are extremely small; the scans deliver an amount of radiation equivalent to 3 to 9 minutes of the radiation received through normal daily living," the authors wrote.


And "since flying itself increases exposure to ionizing radiation, the scan will contribute less than one percent of the dose a flyer will receive from exposure to cosmic rays at elevated altitudes," they added.


"The estimation of cancer risks associated with these scans is difficult, but using the only available models, the risk would be extremely small, even among frequent fliers. We conclude that there is no significant threat of radiation from the scans," they wrote.


Advanced imaging technology X-ray scanners currently in use at airports around the United States sparked an uproar among travelers because they produce a graphic image of a person's naked body, genitalia and all.


Others have worried the scans might be unsafe.


View the original article here