Brian sharp died at his home in Milton area of Glasgow a man in prison for a mentally ill man with a hammer attack his conviction was overturned, after you the trial judge misdirected the jury found.Ian Taylor, 38, and co-defendants Tracey Hastie, 41, were ordered to serve at least 18 years for the killing of Brian sharp, 38, in Glasgow in 2006.
Taylor's lawyers claimed that the jury no direction on the use of hearsay evidence incriminating was given.
Appeal judges decided "a miscarriage of Justice" and quashed the conviction.
During their trial it is Court and Glasgow high, that seeks a rehabilitation centre in the city of Taylor and Hastie met.
Victim stabbedIn October 2006, the couple had drunk with Mr sharp at his home in the town of Milton area when she turned on him, the jury was told.
The Court heard that their victims to a Chair of taped him with a hammer at least 80 times defeated and then stabbed him in the chest with a fork.
Both had denied the murder, claimed the other carried out the attack.
A jury convicted them both and trial judge Lord Brailsford ordered them, at least 18 years above are suitable for parole are used.
Tracey Hastie was jailed for life with Ian Taylor co-defendants.Taylor's legal team put appeal on the grounds that the jury by the judge was misdirected.
You said that during the process a number of witnesses gave evidence about statements Taylor's co-defendants, Hastie, in their presence.
When Lord Brailsford came to direct the jury, he, any direction regarding the use of hearsay evidence could be made without.
Taylor's defense team argued that he not the jury to say that this evidence could not be used to prove the case against their client.
They give their verdict, said Lord Osborne, sitting with Lord Eassie and Lord Nimmo Smith, the Crown was not able to argue that the deception had been no miscarriage of justice.
Mr Osborne, said that in the course of the study, Mr Brailsford said he was going to a direction on the admissibility of statements against Taylor in his need to give the jury, but he never did.
He added: "In all these cases, we have closed, with reluctance, that the misdirection of a miscarriage of Justice has been productive and that is necessary, therefore, sentence lift the appellants."
"It would be a simple matter for the trial judge, give the normal directions, which would have not been appropriate in all circumstances of the case but unfortunately, for whatever reason, he did so."
Mr Osborne said that the evidence from the three witnesses had as prominent, important, and potentially be captured his Mr Taylor.
没有评论:
发表评论